MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392825481 · doi:10.29173/jaed255

Editor’s Introduction

2008· article· en· W4392825481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Warren Weir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When you read the biographies of incredible individuals that have changed the world, or do a quick search of the Internet for inspirational thoughts on "learning by doing", you will inevitably encounter a countless listing of quotes, attributed to notable people such as Doris Lessing, Albert Einstein, or Nelson Mandela.Lessing, for example, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, and leader of campaigns against nuclear arms and South African apartheid, once said that "What matters most is that we learn from living."Albert Einstein, physicist, creator of general and specific theories of relativity, and probably one of the greatest -if not best-known -scientists of the 20th Century, stated that, "Setting an example is not the main means of influencing others, it is the only means."Nelson Mandela, anti-apartheid activist and leader of the African National Congress, is credited with saying that "Education is the most powerful weapon you can use to change the world."And while the words from these and other outstanding leaders are motivational, Aboriginal leaders and community economic development officers and change agents continue to add to the growing list of experiential commentary and inspirational quotes.Many of these may be found in the materials published in JAED's "Lessons from Experience."In this section we hear from Canadian Aboriginal leaders, educators, and development officers about learning from living, setting healthy and sustainable examples, and changing the world through education, among other quotable-quotes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207