MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La resistance a la colonialite numerique

2021· article· fr· W4392829685 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandro Mayoral-Baños

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Possibles · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les technologies numériques sont non seulement colonialistes dans leurs pratiques, mais le sont aussi dans leur création et leur conception. Des propositions provenant de toutes les régions et de toutes les écoles politiques ont été mises en œuvre dans le monde entier pour contrecarrer les effets de la colonialité numérique (par exemple, les grandes sociétés technologiques en Chine, le coup de pouce des organisations internationales pour mettre fin aux inégalités sociales dans le monde au moyen de la numérisation, le rejet des technologies numériques, entre autres), mais on note encore une absence de manières décolonisées et autochtones de créer les technologies numériques.
 Ce court article, basé sur ma recherche doctorale, a donc pour but de formuler des principes de conception des technologies numériques décolonisatrices par le récit de la mise sur pied de la plateforme Indigenous Friends (Indigenous Friends Platform - IFP) destinée aux jeunes Autochtones citadins de l'Université York, à Tkaronto, au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue PossiblesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207