An Archaeological Review of Baekje’s Occupation of the Southwest Coast Region - Focusing on the ancient tombs in Goheung area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to clarify the changes in archaeological data of the Three Kingdoms period in the southwest coast to understand Baekje's dominant strategy and the actual existence of historical events identified in the process. To this end, the characteristics of the ancient tombs were revealed within the Goheung Peninsula, and the disconnection and continuity of indigenous and foreign material cultures were carefully examined. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the transition period of archaeological data in the Goheung area was in the fourth quarter of 4C to the first quarter of 5C. During this period, the inflow of foreign forces was remarkable in the southern region, while indigenous forces were growing in the northern region. However, after the second quarter of 5C, indigenous forces in the north will disappear, but foreign forces in the south will continue to grow. In the first half of the 5th century, considering that foreign cultures replaced indigenous cultures in the southern part of Goheung, it was highly likely that the Historical records of 'the slaughter in the Chimmi Darye region' were real. As a dominant strategy, Baekje distinguished areas that should be controlled first and areas that were not in relation to securing major bases on the transportation route, and it seems that Baekje dispatched Japanese subordinated to Baekje to the top priority area. As a result, it seems that temporary autonomy has been secured in the northern region, which is a certain distance from the marine transportation route. Since then, as negotiations with Baekje and Japan have been concentrated in the southern part of Goheung, transportation routes and trade networks are estimated to be reorganized from the existing northern part to the southern part. In this process, it is judged that indigenous forces in the north are gradually eliminated. On the other hand, the Japanese tombs in the south are no longer contrasted, which is believed to be due to the localization of Japanese people or the growth of emerging indigenous forces supported by Baekje. Since then, the Goheung area in the late Woongjin period is the front-line secondary defense area bordering the Seomjin River, and is organized into the complete region of Baekje as Baekje Fortress is contrasted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".