MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392838054 · doi:10.26593/pedr.v1i2.6666

Analisis Sektor Unggulan: Studi Kasus Wilayah Metropolitan Menado

2023· article· id· W4392838054 on OpenAlexaff
Yoseph Anugerah

Bibliographic record

VenuePARAHYANGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaBusinessGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sulawesi Utara merupakan salah satu provinsi yang akan diperhatikan lebih oleh pemerintah karena di dalamnya terdapat daerah yang akan dijadikan metropolitan baru, yaitu Wilayah Metropolitan Manado yang terdiri dari 3 kota/kabupaten terkait yaitu Kota Manado, Kota Bitung, dan Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Perlunya mengetahui potensi yang dimiliki oleh Wilayah Metropolitan Manado melalui pendekatan sektor unggulan. Alat analisis yang digunakan adalah location quontient untuk mengetahui sektor unggulan serta dynamic location quotient untuk mengetahui potensi sektor unggulan. Data yang digunakan adalah PDRB atas harga konstan dan laju pertumbuhan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara tahun 2014-2018. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan bahwa Wilayah Metropolitan Manado memiliki sektor unggulan dan potensi sektor unggulan yang berbeda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePARAHYANGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEWSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207