MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392838054 · doi:10.26593/pedr.v1i2.6666

Analisis Sektor Unggulan: Studi Kasus Wilayah Metropolitan Menado

2023· article· id· W4392838054 on OpenAlexaff
Yoseph Anugerah

Bibliographic record

VenuePARAHYANGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaBusinessGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sulawesi Utara merupakan salah satu provinsi yang akan diperhatikan lebih oleh pemerintah karena di dalamnya terdapat daerah yang akan dijadikan metropolitan baru, yaitu Wilayah Metropolitan Manado yang terdiri dari 3 kota/kabupaten terkait yaitu Kota Manado, Kota Bitung, dan Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Perlunya mengetahui potensi yang dimiliki oleh Wilayah Metropolitan Manado melalui pendekatan sektor unggulan. Alat analisis yang digunakan adalah location quontient untuk mengetahui sektor unggulan serta dynamic location quotient untuk mengetahui potensi sektor unggulan. Data yang digunakan adalah PDRB atas harga konstan dan laju pertumbuhan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara tahun 2014-2018. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan bahwa Wilayah Metropolitan Manado memiliki sektor unggulan dan potensi sektor unggulan yang berbeda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePARAHYANGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEWSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207