Secrecy Performance Intelligent Prediction for Mobile Vehicular Networks: An DI-CNN Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Internet of Vehicles (IoV) networks has facilitated high throughput and reliable vehicular communications. Mobile vehicular networks face the challenges: diversification of network equipment, user mobility, and the broadcast nature of wireless channels, so physical layer security modeling of IoV communication systems has become important. The complexity of wireless communication channels makes real-time prediction of secrecy performance challenging. This paper presents an analysis of secrecy performance for mobile vehicular networks. To ensure data secure transmission, we have employed the decode-and-forward (DF) relaying scheme. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the effective end-to-end link is employed to obtain the mathematical expression results, which can evaluate the secrecy performance. The theoretical secrecy performance is confirmed via simulation. Then, we design a dense-inception convolution neural network (DI-CNN) model, and propose a DI-CNN-based intelligent prediction algorithm.Transformer, ShuffleNetV2, RegNet and YOLOv5 methods are employed to analyze the performance of DI-CNN algorithm. It is shown that the DI-CNN approach has a prediction accuracy that is 48.8% better than Transformer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".