MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392844129 · doi:10.1071/hc24011

New Zealand’s slow uptake of carbohydrate-reduction in type 2 diabetes management

2024· article· en· W4392844129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcus Hawkins, Caryn Zinn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Primary Health Care · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLicensePublishingCommonsAttributionPolitical scienceLibrary scienceMedicineLawPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a condition that involves insulin resistance and a reduced ability to control blood glucose.Science and logic indicate that reducing the very nutrient that raises blood sugar, ie carbohydrate, would be worth consideration, yet it's been overlooked for many years.Global dietary guidelines have been updated to align with scientific evidence.The American Diabetes Association (ADA), The British Diabetes and Dietetic Associations, Diabetes Canada and Diabetes Australia have included carbohydrate reduction (CR) in their official T2DM dietary guidelines. 1,2An ADA 2019 consensus report concluded: 'reducing overall carbohydrate intake for individuals with diabetes has demonstrated the most evidence for improving glycemia and may be applied in a variety of eating patterns that meet individual needs and preferences'.This report was included in the 2020 ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes update. 3Diabetes Australia states: 'For people with type 2 diabetes, there is reliable evidence that lower carb eating can be safe and useful in lowering average blood glucose levels in the short term (up to 6 months).It can also help reduce body weight and help manage heart disease risk factors such as raised cholesterol and raised blood pressure.' 4 New Zealand (NZ) does not endorse CR as a viable option for individuals, but rather cautions against it.The NZ Society for the Study of Diabetes states in their guidelines 'meta-analyses show that the benefits of ketogenic diets are unlikely to be sustained'. 5,6 and the Ministry of Health states 'Very low carbohydrate diets: Not recommended'. 5 This is surprising, as clinical trials and primary care practice data report beneficial and sustained results from CR. 7,8 Virta Health, a US-based research entity has shown CR to be safe in prediabetes/T2DM.Their 5-year data concluded their model of care showed excellent retention, sustained clinically significant weight loss, stable glycaemic control and less dependency on diabetes medication. 9British general practitioner, Dr David Unwin used CR to reverse/remit T2DM; of 199 patients with T2DM, 46% achieved drug-free remission, with enormous cost savings from reduced diabetes medication. 10 In view of the rapid growth of evidence around CR and T2DM, and the global guideline adoption, we simply ask why NZ is not at least including a CR approach in its guidelines, alongside other dietary approaches, to manage T2DM.We now call upon NZ to catch up and follow suit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Primary Health CareSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207