MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392844991 · doi:10.18254/s207054760030153-5

The Latest Changes in Canada's Foreign Policy: Three Perspectives

2024· article· en· W4392844991 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena G. Komkova

Bibliographic record

VenueRussia and America in the 21st Century · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabinet (room)Prime ministerForeign policyChinaPolitical sciencePrime (order theory)White (mutation)DoctrinePublic administrationLawHistoryPoliticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding itself in a situation where its relations with China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran are spoiled, Canada is looking for a way out in adjusting its doctrine and foreign policy. But unlike in the old days, we are not talking about a White Paper on foreign policy. High–ranking members of the Liberal cabinet in their personal capacity, Deputy Prime Minister Сhrystia Freeland and the Minister of Foreign Affairs Mélanie Joly, make conceptual assessments and proposals. The third participant in the correspondence discussion is the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Wayne Eyre. Which side will take Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and will he even indicate his preferences? The answer is not yet obvious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussia and America in the 21st CenturySame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207