MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392846204 · doi:10.26685/urncst.543

Preventing Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)

2024· article· en· W4392846204 on OpenAlexaff
Abiramee Kathirgamanathan, Akshita Nair

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsMaple Leaf Foods
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiotensin Receptor BlockersAngiotensin-converting enzymeAtrial fibrillationCardiologyMedicineHypertrophic cardiomyopathyInternal medicinePharmacologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a genetic cardiovascular disease, is the leading cause of cardiac death in young people, often due to atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is generally treated using antiarrhythmics and anticoagulants, which have adverse side effects after long-term use, and are therefore unsuitable for young HCM patients. AF is characterized by a rapid and irregular atrial heartbeat, marked by a short action potential duration and atrial effective refractory period in atrial cardiomyocytes. Prior studies have indicated that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in lowering both, so it has been hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which inhibit the renin-angiotensin system, could prevent AF. Therefore, in this study, we propose a research protocol to examine the viability of ACE inhibitors and ARBs as prophylactic measures against the development of AF in HCM patients. To test this, we suggest extracting atrial cardiomyocytes from HCM patients by performing enzyme dissociation on myocardial tissue. The isolated cardiomyocytes will then be treated in vitro with an ACE inhibitor, an ARB, a combination of both, or a control saline solution, and the patch-clamp technique will be used to determine the frequency and duration of their action potentials. We expect action potential duration and atrial effective refractory period to be longer in treated cells, while neither medication will provide a greater advantage, and, as prior research suggests, the combination will not yield significant benefits. The study will continue by testing the effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on the function of atrial myocardial organoids created from differentiated stem cells with an HCM mutation. The results of this study could present a new preventative measure against AF for HCM patients which would be safe for long-term use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207