Two-Layer Edge Intelligence for Task Offloading and Computing Capacity Allocation with UAV Assistance in Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the exponential growth of wireless devices and the demand for real-time processing, traditional server architectures face challenges in meeting the ever-increasing computational requirements. This paper proposes a collaborative edge computing framework to offload and process tasks efficiently in such environments. By equipping a moving unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) as the mobile edge computing (MEC) server, the proposed architecture aims to release the burden on roadside units (RSUs) servers. Specifically, we propose a two-layer edge intelligence scheme to allocate network computing resources. The first layer intelligently offloads and allocates tasks generated by wireless devices in the vehicular system, and the second layer utilizes the partially observable stochastic game (POSG), solved by duelling deep Q-learning, to allocate the computing resources of each processing node (PN) to different tasks. Meanwhile, we propose a weighted position optimization algorithm for the UAV movement in the system to facilitate task offloading and task processing. Simulation results demonstrate the improved performance by applying the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".