MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392859871 · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105103

Transpression or polyphase deformation along craton margins: Insights from the Archean–Proterozoic boundary near Sudbury, Canada

2024· article· en· W4392859871 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Carol-Anne Généreux, Bruno Lafrance, Douglas K. Tinkham, Caroline A. Gordon, R. L. Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Geology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaLaurentian University
FundersSociety of Economic Geologists Canada Foundation
KeywordsGeologyArcheanProterozoicTranspressionCratonPolyphase systemGeochemistryDeformation (meteorology)Shear zonePetrologySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continental margins vary in composition and configuration, resulting in complex structural geometries during deformation. One example is the Archean-Proterozoic boundary near Sudbury, Canada, where the Creighton-Victoria Deformation Zone (CVDZ) contains both reverse dip-slip and dextral strike-slip kinematic indicators. To resolve if these structures formed during a single transpression event or multiple overprinting events, the orientation, relative timing and style of the CVDZ are compared to those of adjacent regional structures. Regional fold axes and their axial planar foliation are subparallel to the steeply-plunging stretching lineation and steeply-dipping foliation, respectively, along the CVDZ. Phase equilibria modelling of syn-tectonic staurolite-chloritoid assemblages indicates that the regional folds and foliation formed at 480–565 °C, similar to temperatures estimated for the formation of dip-slip quartz crystallographic preferred orientations (CPO) along the CVDZ. This suggests that the CVDZ, regional folds and foliation formed during the same regional folding and reverse shearing event. Major lateral lithological changes and inflections in the orientation of the craton margin controlled the formation of structures, and evidence for regional transpression, such as strike-slip kinematic indicators, steeply-plunging stretching lineation, and obliquity of regional folds with respect to major shear zones, resulted from polyphase deformation and transcurrent reactivation of the Superior craton margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Structural GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207