MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392867050 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.08998

Frequency- and dissipation-dependent entanglement advantage in spin-network Quantum Reservoir Computing

2024· preprint· en· W4392867050 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Youssef Kora, Hadi Zadeh‐Haghighi, Terrence C. Stewart, Khabat Heshami, Christoph Simon

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantum entanglementReservoir computingSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsQuantum sensorQuantumQuantum networkQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the performance of an Ising spin network for quantum reservoir computing (QRC) in linear and non-linear memory tasks. We investigate the extent to which quantumness enhances performance by monitoring the behaviour of quantum entanglement, which we quantify by the partial transpose of the density matrix. In the most general case where the effects of dissipation are incorporated, our results indicate that the strength of the entanglement advantage depends on the frequency of the input signal; the benefit of entanglement is greater with more rapidly fluctuating signals, whereas a low-frequency input is better suited to a non-entangled reservoir. This may be understood as a condition for an entanglement advantage to manifest itself: the system's quantum memory must survive for long enough for the temporal structure of the input signal to reveal itself. We also find that quantum entanglement empowers a spin-network quantum reservoir to remember a greater number of temporal features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207