MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392867874 · doi:10.1590/1806-9479.2023.267478

Evolução da mobilidade educacional e da acumulação do capital humano no Brasil entre 1996 e 2014: os desafios para subgrupos da população

2024· article· pt· W4392867874 on OpenAlexaff
Adriano Firmino Valdevino de Araújo, José Luis da Silva Netto, Liédje Bettizaide Oliveira de Siqueira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Economia e Sociologia Rural · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceHuman capitalEconomicsEconomic growthPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo O presente estudo pretende averiguar o crescimento da acumulação do capital humano no Brasil entre os anos de 1996 e 2014 para subgrupos da população. A partir dos dados do suplemento de mobilidade educacional da Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra de Domicílios dos referidos anos e o uso da metodologia do Processo de Markov combinado com aplicação da Decomposição de Blinder-Oaxaca foi possível detectar ganhos diferenciados de acúmulo de capital humano para os grupos analisados. Os resultados apontam que houve uma melhoria considerável da educação para as mulheres e ainda para os indivíduos declarados pretos e os filhos corresidentes, entretanto, chama atenção a baixa mobilidade educacional para as pessoas residentes no setor rural. Esta pesquisa inova ao incorporar as mulheres e os filhos dependentes na amostra, bem como ao analisar os diferenciais de acumulação de capital humano entre subgrupos populacionais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Economia e Sociologia RuralSame topicIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesFrench-language works237,207