MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392870398 · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_190_22

No more relay of the delay: Passing the baton to the digital technologies

2022· article· en· W4392870398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harsh Priya, M.S.S. Bharathi, Pallavi Shukla, Deepika Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research Statistics and Treatment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with great interest the article by Singla et al.[1] titled, “Impact of demographic factors on delayed presentation of oral cancers – A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study from a rural cancer center,” in the previous issue of the journal. The glaring finding that was an eye-opener for us was that the lag from the onset of symptoms to the medical consultation was most often reported as 3 months, and that to the cancer diagnosis was 5.5 months. The common causes of this delay could be categorized as patient-related or health professional-related. Social media and tele dentistry have the superpowers to tackle both these barriers in the early detection of oral premalignant lesions and oral cancer. The Government of India has launched the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS),[2] under which oral cancer has garnered a lot of attention. There were screenings and oral health checkups conducted for targeted and general populations.[3] Along with these programs, the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP),[4] and National Oral Health Program (NOHP),[5] also started with tobacco cessation counseling and promotion of oral health. The need of the hour is to follow-up on these screened individuals through mobile application tracking technologies. An interactive mobile application would enable the patient to fulfill his/her responsibility to firstly upload the usage pattern of his/her tobacco and other risk factors, and subsequently to report distantly any change in the identified lesions in their oral cavity. Such an application would also allow the healthcare professional to encourage behavior modification and regular oral health consultation. This two-way health communication could initially occur in person, and once the patient has been registered in the mobile application, he/she could be followed up digitally. In case of any red flags, immediate communication and referrals to the tertiary center can be done thereby shortening the delay. The mobile application with features of interactive chats especially in local languages would empower the patients to clear their slightest doubts and thus, to nip them in the bud. The facility provided by the application for clicking and uploading the images of any change in the oral lesion by the patient would again make them feel connected to the health care professional, thereby removing the distance barrier. Digital technologies are impacting the health sector in a beneficial manner. The only challenge is the digital illiteracy[6] and denial of the individual’s health freedom. Reorienting the health education system with digital technologies would be the most appropriate strategy to follow the principles of the Ottawa Charter in health promotion.[7] There will never be enough tertiary care facilities, hence the primary prevention of oral premalignant lesions and oral cancers through mobile applications could be a game changer in lessening the delay of early detection and prompt treatment. Hence, the baton of oral cancer diagnosis needs to be passed on to the digital technologies, to together fight the battle against the disease. Financial support and sponsorship This manuscript has been developed in support of blending digital technology for early detection and prompt treatment of oral premalignant lesions and oral cancer Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research Statistics and TreatmentSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207