<i>Dance on the Razor’s Edge: Crime and Punishment in the Nazi Ghettos</i>. Svenja Bethke, trans., Sharon Howe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In June 1942, the Jewish judges of the Vilna Ghetto court handed down their first death penalty, sentencing five ghetto residents accused of murdering a yeshiva student and burying his body. During the trial, the accused also admitted to the murder and robbery of another ghetto inmate. Additionally, another ghetto resident received a death sentence for the murder of a police officer. All six individuals were subsequently executed in the ghetto by Jewish policemen in the presence of the head of the Judenrat, Jacob Gens (p. 114). This event in Vilna stands in contrast to a similar case that occurred earlier in the Lodz Ghetto in December 1941. In that case, a ghetto resident named Szlomo Bernstein was charged with killing his brother-in-law; despite the option of the death penalty, he was ultimately sentenced only to two years’ imprisonment with hard labor. When grappling with the ghetto penal system, Jewish functionaries asked themselves, “What punishments can be imposed in a coerced community where people’s first concern is to feed themselves and ensure their own and their relatives’ survival?”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".