COMMUNITY-BASED SOCIAL HEALING, COMMUNITY HEALING, AND THE ROLE OF “HEALING LEADER”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The guideline of "community-based social healing" is relevant nowadays. It is based on the importance of community in supporting individual healing (treatment and maintaining wholeness) and the efficiency of civil society. The article defines that the reverse and interdependent side of working with the community – both when the community is the goal of grassroots initiatives and when it is a means of "community-based social healing" – is the need for "community healing". A special need, urgent for the healing of collective traumas, is defined as the formation ("healing") of a specific healing community, which can be called "transformative" or "processual", which is aimed at the very process of transformation. The term "healing leader" is proposed to denote the special role in external healing intervention – for a person who serves the community, supports it from within, and at the same time, must maintain an external position for permanent analysis and readjustment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".