MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392881196 · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100105

Corrigendum to “Obesity pillars roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in black and female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?” [Obesity Pillars 4C (2022) 100044]

2024· erratum· en· W4392881196 on OpenAlexaff
Harold Bays, Sylvia Gonsahn-Bollie, Courtney Younglove, Sean Wharton

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Pillars · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoYork UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace (biology)Body mass indexObesityComposition (language)Index (typography)Black maleBlack femaleGender studiesGerontologyMedicineEndocrinologySociologyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100044.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity PillarsSame topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207