MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Health Cure: Historical Experience of Old Democracy and Lessons for Russia

2023· article· en· W4392881837 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Konstantin Yanovskiy

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues of Economic Theory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Sanctions and International Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFreie Universität BerlinMcGill UniversityYale UniversityStrongWorld Health OrganizationHarvard UniversityAmerican Philosophical Society
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Life expectancyHealth careDemocracyPublic healthBusinessPolitical scienceEconomicsPublic administrationEconomic growthLawMedicinePoliticsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contrary to widespread belief government-run Healthcare was not the first mass affordable solution for medical problems. Governmental healthcare has not caused main breakthroughs in the mortality decrease and significant increase in average life expectancy. Safeguards for private property and ironclad protection of personal rights and liberties caused modern economic growth phenomena, a rise in wealth, and unleashed scientific and technical progress. The rise in wealth and scientific progress were the principal reasons behind progress in medicine. Nowadays huge government spending and poor efficiency make unclear the overall impact of government-run healthcare on public health. The government's Famous attempts to protect drug consumers caused huge costs possibly outweighing their benefits. The foremost public concern ought to be the numerous ethical challenges of the governmental rule in Healthcare, the power usurped by healthcare officials to decide for and instead the patient his fate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssues of Economic TheorySame topicEconomic Sanctions and International RelationsFrench-language works237,207