Nilai Ekonomi Lahan Pertanian di Wilayah Kerja Cabang Dinas Kehutanan IV Kabupaten Cianjur Jawa Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Land is the most important resource in supporting agricultural activities but land is limited. Therefore, land use must be wise and need economic considerations. The economic value of agricultural land is seen based on the level of fertility which is quantified by the production and production costs. This study aims to determine the average economic value of agricultural land and determine the most optimum economic value of land based on the types of commodities in Forestry Service Branch IV Working Area, Cianjur Regency, West Java. This research was conducted in Cianjur Regency, West Java from November 2022 to May 2023. Data was collected through direct interviews with 40 respondents. The average economic value of agricultural land in Forestry Service Branch IV Working Area, Cianjur Regency, West Java is Rp. 8.130/m²/cycle. The most optimal economic value of land in one cycle is the chili commodity in the amount of Rp. 9.530/m²/cycle while the most optimum economic value of land in one year is the cabbage commodity of Rp. 28.218/m²/year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".