The Experimental Study on Lead Acid Battery Driven E-Rickshaw Performance Using Capacitor Bank
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experimental study investigates the performance of Lead Acid Battery driven Electric Rickshaws (E-Rickshaws) enhanced with a Capacitor Bank.With a growing demand for sustainable urban transportation solutions, E-Rickshaws have emerged as a promising option.However, challenges such as limited battery life and variable performance under different load conditions persist.In this research, we explore the application of a Capacitor Bank circuitry to mitigate these challenges.The study involves a series of performance tests conducted on E-Rickshaws equipped with the proposed hardware model.Key parameters, including charging current, charging time, and discharging current under varying load conditions, are rigorously analyzed.Our experimental results reveal substantial improvements in E-Rickshaw performance when compared to conventional Lead Acid Battery-driven models.Notably, reductions in starting current and minimized power fluctuations, especially under full load conditions, lead to a smoother and more efficient driving experience.Crucially, the extended battery life resulting from these hardware enhancements demonstrates the economic viability of the modified E-Rickshaw prototype.This research contributes valuable insights into the sustainable transformation of urban transportation, with implications for both performance optimization and economic feasibility in the E-Rickshaw industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".