MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392890910 · doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1441082

The Investigation of Tropospheric Changes with GNSS: A study on 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Sequence

2024· article· en· W4392890910 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Seda Özarpacı

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsTroposphereZenithGNSS applicationsGeologyGeodetic datumSeismologyGeodesyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesGlobal Positioning System

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The earthquakes that occurred in Kahramanmaraş on February 6, 2023, are among the significant seismic events in Turkey. Recorded at moment magnitudes of 7.8 and 7.6 in ten hours on East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), these earthquakes resulted in extensive destruction and loss of lives in the region. The effects of these earthquakes have been actively studied following the events, utilizing geodetic measurement techniques, particularly GNSS measurements, which are commonly employed in earthquake studies for determining tectonic movements and crustal deformations. As known, GNSS signals pass through significant atmospheric layers, namely the ionosphere and troposphere, before reaching the Earth's surface, and the influence of these atmospheric layers is evident in the results due to various error sources within these layers. One of the main limiting factors in studies such as determining crustal movements is the influence of the troposphere, as surface velocities are on the order of a few mm/yr and require high accuracy (at the mm level). In this study, changes in the troposphere during the earthquakes on February 6, 2023, were investigated using tropospheric zenith delays (Zenith Total Delay - ZTD) computed from GNSS observations. The results indicate the presence of zenith tropospheric delay anomalies at stations close to the fault rupture during and after the main shock, while no such anomalies were observed at distant stations from the fault rupture zone. This finding indicates a relationship between earthquakes and changes occurring in the troposphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environment and GeoinformaticsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207