MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392894321 · doi:10.29407/dimastara.v3i1.21595

Peningkatan Perekonomian Umkm Desa Puhjajar Kecamatan Papar Kabupaten Kediri Melalui Penerapan Inovasi Mesin Perajang Lontongan Kerupuk Otomatis

2024· article· en· W4392894321 on OpenAlexaff
Hesti Istiqlaliyah, Kuni Nadliroh, Ah. Sulhan Fauzi, Wibowo Harso Nugroho, Arif Sugianto

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Agricultural sciencePopulationBusinessEngineeringSociologyEnvironmental scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Puhjajar is one of the villages in Papar District, Kediri Regency with the majority of the population making their living as producers of realizeyah crackers. They are members of associations, each of which consists of 11 craftsmen, where each craftsman has four to six members. The realizeyah crackers produced by the people of Puhjajar village are very famous among the cracker industry, especially in Kediri. In fact, in the marketing of these realizeyah crackers, they are sent outside Java and overseas. However, the problem arises as the market for realizeyah cracker products increases, namely that the realizeyah cracker producers have not been able to increase their production capacity. So there are often delays in delivery which can result in disappointing consumers. This happens because the production process is quite long, and raw materials are sometimes difficult to obtain. It was from this problem that the Nusantara University PGRI Kediri community service team tried to help solve the problems faced by producers by designing an automatic cracker cracker chopping machine. The results obtained after using this machine were an increase in production capacity, which initially only reached 80kg/day to around 350kg/day. Manufacturers are of course greatly helped by the existence of this chopping machine, they are ultimately able to meet the quite high market demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat NusantaraSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207