MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392901694 · doi:10.32920/25417399

Grassroots Activation of Public Space: A Toronto Neighbourhood Improvement Area Context

2024· preprint· en· W4392901694 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam Dhalla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsEquity (law)Neighbourhood (mathematics)Public spaceContext (archaeology)Public healthPolitical sciencePublic administrationGeographyPublic relationsSociologyEconomic growthMedicinePoliticsEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through grassroots, public space activation, the City of Toronto can improve equity within its 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs). Toronto City Council created NIAs under the 2020 Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy (The TSNS), identified as neighbourhoods that scored lowest when assessed using the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART). These NIAs often have more grassroots organizations than non-NIA designated neighbourhoods. Promoting citizenled activations of public spaces in Neighborhood Improvement Areas holds the potential to strengthen the Urban HEART domains. Therefore, the onus is on the City of Toronto to create, foster, and maintain relationships with grassroots organizations from NIAs to activate public spaces. This paper will aim to provide recommendations for the City of Toronto to improve the quality of grassroots public space activations in its NIAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPublic Health Policies and EducationFrench-language works237,207