MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392902477 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2024.3378350

Bipolar Semiactive Bridge Converter With Cross-Cycle Modulation for Resilience Enhancement in Bipolar DC Distribution Systems

2024· article· en· W4392902477 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Chen, Jianjun Ma, Miao Zhu, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsModulation (music)Electrical engineeringResilience (materials science)ConvertersBridge (graph theory)Electronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a bipolar DC distribution system, a monopolar fault can result in a power outage for the load connected to the faulted pole. To provide a resilient load supply, a bipolar semi-active bridge (BiSAB) converter is proposed in this paper as an interface converter. With the proposed BiSAB converter, the monopolar short-circuit fault can be blocked from the load, and uninterrupted power can be drawn from the normal pole. During normal bipolar operation, the BiSAB converter can also provide power regulation capability between the positive and negative poles. Moreover, the cross-cycle modulation strategy is proposed and implemented on the BiSAB to improve the efficiency in the normal bipolar mode. The characteristics and fault-tolerant function of the proposed converter and modulation strategy are verified by experiment, and the resilient load supply capability of the BiSAB is validated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207