HAROOD: Human Activity Classification and Out-Of-Distribution Detection with Short-Range FMCW Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose HAROOD as a short-range FMCW radar-based human activity classifier and out-of-distribution (OOD) detector. It aims to classify human sitting, standing, and walking activities and to detect any other moving or stationary object as OOD. We introduce a two-stage network. The first stage is trained with a novel loss function that includes intermediate reconstruction loss, intermediate contrastive loss, and triplet loss. The second stage uses the first stage’s output as its input and is trained with cross-entropy loss. It creates a simple classifier that performs the activity classification. On our dataset collected by 60 GHz short-range FMCW radar, we achieve an average classification accuracy of 96.51%. Also, we achieve an average AUROC of 95.04% as an OOD detector. Additionally, our extensive evaluations demonstrate the superiority of HAROOD over the state-of-the-art OOD detection methods in terms of standard OOD detection metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".