Stigmergy and Hierarchical Learning for Routing Optimization in Multi-Domain Collaborative Satellite Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents promising opportunities for managing and optimizing LEO satellite network routing. However, as the scale and coverage of satellite networks continue to expand, challenges are posed to both centralized and distributed architectures in terms of managing network information and coping with routing complexity. To overcome these challenges, leveraging distributed SDN technology, a stigmergy multi-agent hierarchical deep reinforcement learning routing algorithm is proposed in multi-domain collaborative satellite networks. A pheromone-based mechanism is incorporated to facilitate collaboration during independent training, and hierarchical control is employed to decouple the complexity of cross-domain routing decisions. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed algorithm exhibits good scalability and performance in large-scale satellite networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it