MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A New Maintenance Plan for Wind Turbine Farms Using Reinforcement Learning

2024· article· en· W4392905317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningPlan (archaeology)TurbineReinforcementComputer scienceWind powerEngineeringMarine engineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the challenge of maintenance planning for multi-component systems, focusing specifically on wind turbine farms, which play a vital role in electricity production. Traditional approaches to maintenance planning rely on pre-specified thresholds, triggering maintenance actions based on conditions such as production rate, system age, or failure states. However, this study proposes a dynamic approach to maintenance planning that considers the actual state of the system in real-time. The system is modeled as a large-scale multi-component parallel production system, where each unit can be in one of three states: good, partial failure, or failure. The transitions between states are governed by a continuous Markov chain, enabling a comprehensive representation of the system's behavior. By utilizing this dynamic modeling approach, maintenance actions can be scheduled based on the current state of the system, allowing for more efficient and effective maintenance decision-making. To optimize the system's profit in an infinite planning horizon, a Markov Decision Process framework is employed. However, due to the exponential increase in the number of system states with the number of units, traditional dynamic programming algorithms are insufficient for solving this large-scale MDP. Hence, reinforcement learning algorithms, specifically Qlearning, are utilized to determine the maintenance actions based on the current system state. The objective of this study is to maximize the system's profit by considering various factors, including the costs of lost demand, profit from overproduction, and the costs associated with maintenance actions. From a practical standpoint, this research holds several values for industries reliant on multi-component production systems. Maintenance managers can harness the insights obtained from this study to formulate cost-effective strategies, ensuring minimal downtime and maximum system uptime. Moreover, as industries progressively lean towards automation and smart manufacturing, the methodologies presented here will be invaluable for integrating AI-driven maintenance protocols

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207