MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392906046 · doi:10.32920/25413808.v1

Latency Efficient Cache Placement Using Learning Techniques in Mobile Edge Networks

2024· preprint· en· W4392906046 on OpenAlexaff
Lubna Badri Mohammed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkMobile edge computingBase stationCache algorithmsEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionWireless networkRadio access networkLatency (audio)Distributed computingWirelessCPU cacheServerCloud computingMobile stationTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future wireless networks provide interesting research challenges with the exponential growth in mobile data traffic, the advent of new high computational and real-time applications that cause many-fold increases in traffic and require low latency from the network. The emerging need to bring data closer to users and minimize the traffic off the macrocell base station (MBS) introduces caches at the edge of the networks. Storing most popular files in user terminals (UTs) and small base stations (SBSs) caches inside the mobile edge networks (MENs) is a promising approach to the challenges that face future data-rich wireless networks. Caching in the mobile UT allows obtaining requested contents directly from its nearby UT caches through device-to-device communication. This thesis addresses several challenges faced in developing a solution for cache placement at the edge of the network due to continuous changes in content popularity, user mobility, and the number of users within each network. It also considers the challenges related to high computation requirements of future applications that need to satisfy power and delivery time constraints. This dissertation aims to overcome those challenges in developing new solutions by employing intelligence and machine learning techniques (ILT) for mobile edge networks. We formulate the cache placement problem as a latency-efficient cache placement optimization problem that considers four objectives, to place contents in SBSs and UT caches. The multi-objective function takes advantage of user mobility patterns to decide on each SBS and UT cache content. The function is resolved into a weighted fusion decision with four objectives. Three of them are related to user mobility computed from previous data sets, and one objective is related to content popularity. We study the impact of user mobility on increasing the cache hit rate, which decreases the latency of downloading the requested data content. The results show the effect of user mobility on reducing the total energy consumed for transmitting the contents to the UTs. We propose a new cache placement algorithm based on user locations, contact probability, communication range, contact duration, and content popularity, formulating cache placement decisions as a binary classification problem (to cache and not to cache). Artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) are used to model cache placement decisions. We investigate the characteristics of the input features (attributes) and the properties of these characteristics that affect supervised machine learning approaches. The performance of the new cache placement models using supervised learning techniques is evaluated to study the sensitivity of classification decisions with the change of system parameters. Finally, we develop a semi-supervised self-training (SSST) classification model for the cache placement problem. We assess the proposed SSST algorithm through experiments with datasets on different learning techniques. The performance comparison of different machine learning models was carried out with the same datasets. For the hit rate, we investigated the sensitivity of the classification by the changes in the environment parameters to show the effectiveness of the proposed theme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207