MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392906733 · doi:10.32920/25412725

2D Material Doping in Ion Conducting Membranes Used for Energy Storage Applications

2024· preprint· en· W4392906733 on OpenAlexaff
Kane Ho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrolyteThermal runawayBattery (electricity)Boron nitrideElectrochemistryIonic conductivityEnergy storageDopingMembranePolymerConductivityThermal stabilityChemical engineeringNanotechnologyElectrodeComposite materialChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrolyte component of a battery plays a crucial part in its power density and ion balancing as it acts as an ion-carrier between electrodes. However, the use of liquid electrolytes in batteries can cause issues with thermal runaway, leakage, flammability and ultimately battery failure if cell damage occurs. In this thesis, a Gel Polymer Electrolyte (GPE) is reinforced with exfoliated 2D Boron Nitride (BN) nanosheets — a unique 2D nanomaterial that possesses electronically insulating properties while having high specific surface area and thermal conductivity to reinforce the electrolyte component used in batteries. The properties of the GPE are analyzed by looking at the mechanism of ion conduction within polymer chains and how BN can be used as nanofillers to enhance electrochemical performances. The optimal doping of BN to a porous GPE can then lead to improved thermal stability, ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability for safer operation conditions of batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207