MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392908482 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2024.3376084

Achieving Practical and Privacy-Preserving kNN Query Over Encrypted Data

2024· article· en· W4392908482 on OpenAlexaff
Yandong Zheng, Rongxing Lu, Songnian Zhang, Jun Shao, Hui Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceEncryptionInformation privacyQuery optimizationData miningComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the most popular queries in big data era, the$k$nearest neighbors ($k$NN) query plays a significant role in various applications, such as medical diagnosis, signal processing, and recommendation systems. Meanwhile, driven by the advancement of the cloud service, an emerging trend among applications is to outsource the dataset and the corresponding$k$NN query services to the cloud. However, as the cloud is not fully trusted, those applications will face vital privacy concerns, and thus they usually encrypt data before outsourcing them to the cloud. Because encrypted data are outsourced to cloud, the$k$NN query over encrypted data has become increasingly attractive, and many solutions have been put forth in recent years. However, existing solutions cannot fully satisfy the objects of returning exact query results, protecting database privacy and query privacy, achieving high query efficiency, and imposing low computational costs at the user side. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a new practical and privacy-preserving$k$NN query scheme. Specifically, we first refine the general security requirements for the matrix encryption by systematically analyzing existing algorithms. Then, we design a novel asymmetric matrix encryption (AME) to securely achieve Euclidean distance computation and two distances comparison in a single-party and non-interactive way. Then, based on the AME scheme, we propose a privacy-preserving$k$NN query scheme, in which a max-heap of size$k$is used to accelerate query efficiency. Detailed security analysis shows that our proposed scheme is really privacy-preserving. In addition, extensive performance evaluations are conducted, and the results demonstrate that our proposed scheme is also highly efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207