“Now You See Me": Examining the Sartorial Practices of Young Migrant Muslim Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sartorial practices of Muslim women are often viewed through a lens of fashion identity and religious identity. This research explored the intersectionality of young migrant Muslim women and how it shaped their lived experienced. This research methodological approach focused on a critical literature review, semi-structured interviews and wardrobe interviews. The critical literature review allowed an in-depth analysis of existing research surrounding different themes of the dressing practices of Muslim women in a Western context. In addition, the semi-structured interviews and wardrobe interviews allowed a personal in-sight in understanding how intersectional identities are presented through dressing practices. The findings indicate that the sartorial practices of young migrant Muslim women are impacted by gendered Islamophobia, intra-religious conflict, spatial visibility and challenging Western norms. It was uncovered that the participants engaged in situational dressing practices which allowed them to shape the perception of their identities. In doing so, they adjust their garment through spatial visibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".