Decision-making Model of Distribution Watermains Renewal With Lining and Replacement Techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>This project aims to formulate a Life Cycle Cost-based decision-making model for watermains renewal with lining and replacement techniques in consideration. The model enables asset managers in municipalities in Ontario, Canada, to fulfill the legislation mandates of asset management planning via setting levels of service, formulating lifecycle activities, and putting watermains management into financial planning. It also addresses concerns about the uncertainty that entails the current age-based condition estimation method adopted by most of the municipalities in Canada. The model incorporates five key components and is developed into a Microsoft Excel-based planning tool. The application of the tool is then demonstrated in a case study with a hypothetical network. The results have shown that asset managers could address the legislative requirements on levels of service, lifecycle activities, and financial planning and tackle some of the problems faced in budgeting exercise with a constrained investment.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it