Electromagnetic Field Impacts on Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Abundance, Relative Abundance and Community Compositions in In-Situ Microcosms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study focuses on the response of a pond’s planktonic community to a low-power (< 10 W) electromagnetic field (EMF) generating device using in situ microcosms. The objective was to observe the effects of EMF on total phytoplankton and zooplankton abundance, relative abundance and community composition of major taxa. Fifteen microcosms were installed into a pond in Stony Creek, ON to isolate water columns of 1 m in depth. Samples were collected biweekly for twelve weeks. Phytoplankton and zooplankton samples were collected by towing a plankton net vertically through the water columns. Overall, the EMF treatment has resulted in a subtle but significant increase in relative abundance of green algae and diatoms. The prolonged exposure to EMFs were also shown to impact copepod abundance and the biovolume temporal trends of green algae and cyanobacteria. Therefore, EMFs have a potential to affect zooplankton and phytoplankton abundance or community composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it