MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392918854 · doi:10.1002/eqe.4113

Mitigation of residual deformations in eccentrically braced frames through a low‐cost re‐centering mechanism

2024· article· en· W4392918854 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Mortazavi, Constantin Christopoulos, Oh‐Sung Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsResidualStructural engineeringBraced frameMechanism (biology)BracingFrame (networking)EngineeringComputer scienceGeologyForensic engineeringBracePhysicsMechanical engineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previous studies have demonstrated that the response of stable yielding systems to random excitations such as earthquakes is inherently accompanied by residual deformations. Stable yielding systems with highly enhanced ductility capacity are more prone to residual deformations. Steel eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) are designed to sustain significant localized inelastic deformations in the segment of the beam referred to as the yielding link, which results in much larger link rotations when compared to inter‐story drift ratios (SDR). Recent experimental and numerical studies on the response of EBFs have demonstrated that even with moderate residual inter‐SDR (less than 0.5%), severe link residual rotations could be expected, which could render the structure difficult to repair. For replaceable yielding links, which were developed to expedite the repair and recovery process in EBFs after major seismic events, large residual link rotations will hinder the link replacement process or at times make it impossible. Therefore, mitigation of residual deformations is of greater importance in EBFs with replaceable yielding links than in conventional EBFs with a continuous beam. This paper provides a brief review of past research on residual deformations and methods for their mitigation. A low‐cost re‐centering system for use in EBFs is proposed to work in parallel with the yielding link, in order to mitigate residual deformations. The proposed system is adopted for two prototype structures designed with EBFs equipped with cast steel replaceable modular yielding links. The effectiveness of the re‐centering strategy is evaluated by means of pseudo‐dynamic hybrid simulations, as well as numerical simulations. The hybrid simulations and numerical studies both demonstrate that not only the proposed system is highly effective at mitigating the residual deformations, but also it is effective in reducing the peak deformations in EBFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207