CROPseq-multi: a universal solution for multiplexed perturbation in high-content pooled CRISPR screens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forward genetic screens seek to dissect complex biological systems by systematically perturbing genetic elements and observing the resulting phenotypes. While standard screening methodologies introduce individual perturbations, multiplexing perturbations improves the performance of single-target screens and enables combinatorial screens for the study of genetic interactions. Current tools for multiplexing perturbations are limited by technical challenges and do not offer compatibility across diverse screening methodologies, including enrichment, single-cell sequencing, and optical pooled screens. Here, we report the development of CROPseq-multi (CSM), a CROPseq-inspired lentiviral system to multiplex Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) Cas9-based perturbations with versatile readout compatibility and high performance for both perturbation and barcode identification. CSM has equivalent per-guide activity to CROPseq and low lentiviral recombination frequencies. Dual-guide CSM libraries are constructed in a single, facile molecular cloning step that facilitates the use of unique molecular identifiers. CSM is compatible with enrichment screening methodologies, single-cell RNA-sequencing readouts, and optical pooled screens. For optical pooled screens, an optimized and multiplexed in situ detection protocol improves barcode counts 10-fold (for mRNA detection), enables detection of recombination events, and reduces the number of sequencing cycles required for decoding by 3-fold relative to CROPseq. CROPseq-multi-v2 (CSMv2) adds compatibility for detection methods based on T7 RNA polymerase in vitro transcription. CSM provides a single system for CRISPR screens that is compatible with individual and combinatorial perturbations, diverse SpCas9-based perturbation technologies, and multiple high-content, single-cell phenotypic readouts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".