Vertebral Artery Mobilization During Transcondylar Extreme Far Lateral Approach for Excision of Large Foramen Magnum Meningioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foramen magnum meningiomas are challenging lesions owing to their proximity to the lower brainstem, vertebrobasilar system, and lower cranial nerves.1,2 Tumor size, origin, morphology, relationship to neurovascular structures, and bony anatomy determine the optimal surgical approach.2,3 Classically, far lateral approaches have been the workhorse approach to the foramen magnum. Variations of the far lateral including transcondylar and extended transcondylar (paracondylar), with or without transposition of the vertebral artery, are sometimes used for a more lateral approach to the brainstem and clivus. Here, we present a 60-year-old male patient presenting with a large foramen magnum meningioma. Preoperative workup includes computed tomography and MRI with angiography to assess for posterior circulation dominance, anatomic variants including posterior inferior cerebellar artery origin, venous, and bony anatomy.1,4 An extreme far lateral provides access anterior to the vertebral artery to extend exposure beyond the standard far lateral approach. This comprised transcondylar drilling, bony mobilization of the V3 Vertebral artery from C1 foramen transversarium, and dural mobilization of vertebral artery with a dural cuff at its site of dural entry. The patient tolerated the procedure, gross total resection was achieved, and the patient was discharged home. This video demonstrates in detail the steps of exposure, condylar drilling, vertebral artery transposition, and dural opening. These maneuvers can be difficult to conceptualize yet are key to successful extended transcondylar exposure. The patient gave informed consent for surgery and video recording. Institutional Review Board approval was deemed unnecessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it