MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392927350 · doi:10.32920/25413814.v1

A Decision-Making Method for Run-Time Structural Adaptation Of FPGA-Based SOCS to Variations in Workload, Power Budget, Die Temperature, and Hardware Resources

2024· preprint· en· W4392927350 on OpenAlexafffund
Dimple Sharma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityCMC Microsystems (Canada)
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceEmbedded systemTask (project management)Adaptation (eye)Power (physics)WorkloadSoftware deploymentSet (abstract data type)Field (mathematics)EngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Embedded systems for application domains like robotics, aerospace, defense, etc. nowadays are developed on System-on-Chip (SoC) platforms based on Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) devices to support computation-intensive multi-task multi-modal dynamic workloads common for these applications. These systems therefore face the challenge to sustain the performance of their dynamic workloads in presence of variations in power budget, die temperature, and/or occurrence of hardware faults. This work proposes Run-time Structural Adaptation (RTSA) as a mechanism for mitigating these factors. One of the major contributions of this work is creation of a run-time decision-making method, “Explorer”, to carry out RTSA for FPGA-based SoCs and mitigate variations in the internal and external factors simultaneously. Whenever there is a change in the system’s set of constraints, Explorer selects an appropriate variant of hardware processing circuit for each active task from a large design space to form a system configuration that satisfies each task’s performance specification and all other system constraints. To support the practical deployment of Explorer, this work presents a method to derive run-time power consumption and die temperature estimation models for any FPGA-based device. This novel methodology of model derivation based on the FPGA platform and application running on it is another contribution of this work. The model derivation methods are formulated after detailed experimental analysis of power consumption and thermal behaviors of recent FPGA devices. Explorer can evaluate potential system configurations using the derived models to select a suitable system configuration for RTSA. Experimental implementation of Explorer on the Zynq XC7Z020 SoC shows worst case execution time of 130 us, which demonstrates its suitability for RTSA for most applications associated with multi-stream computation-intensive tasks. This work also proposes an approach for automating model derivation which helps systems self-derive their model coefficients during system production and re-derive them due to changes in system platform, application, and/or environmental conditions. This significantly reduces model derivation time while avoiding any human involvement. This work thus presents the methods and models necessary to enable real systems utilizing FPGA devices to carry out RTSA and sustain their dynamic workloads amid dynamic environmental and hardware resource constraints.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207