MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392927911 · doi:10.32920/25417231

Design and Testing of Climate-responsive Ventilated Building Façades

2024· preprint· en· W4392927911 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shahrzad Soudian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsFacadeArchitectural engineeringEfficient energy useEnvironmental scienceBuilding designClimate changeComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementCivil engineeringEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancing building performance has become a focal point in reducing the environmental impacts of the built environment to address climate change. Considering the highest share of comfort-related energy use in buildings, and the importance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ), a balance between energy conservation and IEQ provision is required. Building façades are the primary boundary that control mass and energy flow in buildings. Dynamic façades are potential alternatives to existing high-performance façades to improve IEQ in buildings, as they change their functionality with time, in response to changing environmental loads. This study aims to design and develop a multifunctional climate-responsive façade (CRF) in a continental climate. First, the literature review presents CRF theories and technologies. To design the CRF conceptually, a performance-based design framework was developed. This tool can be used in the initial decision-making stage of CRFs to conceptualize them based on case-specific performance metrics. The design of the conceptual CRF was optimized using CFD simulations in the climate of Toronto, Canada. The façade is a multifunctional, integrated, climate-responsive, opaque and ventilated (MICRO-V) façade, which regulates heat, air, and moisture flow into buildings. MICRO-V comprises a pre-conditioned cavity with phase change materials, and an adjustable insulation system integrated with a bi-directional ventilation module with heat recovery. The design of the MICRO-V was finalized by selecting the best-performing configuration of geometry, material properties, and operation. The results showed a 77% pre-conditioning efficiency of air in the ventilation module. Also, the thermal transmittance of the insulation could change from 0.05 to 0.5 W/m2.K with airflow variation. The simulations showed the interactions between the MICRO-V components, leading to the façade prototype. The performance of this prototype was evaluated using experimental tests in the BETOP test cell in Toronto. The results demonstrated the performance of the façade under different operation scenarios, and its ability to pre-condition fresh air while controlling thermal exchanges in the room. The experimental tests confirmed an agreeable compatibility with the simulation results. In this study, a design process from concept generation to prototype development of CRFs was presented that could be expanded and used in future research. MICRO-V is a CRF with decentralized ventilation that could be adjusted to different building contexts and climates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→