6. Les conditions de la rationalité technique des ingénieurs au temps de Vauban
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours du XVIIe siècle, se développent et se codifient des méthodes de rationalisation des projets d’ingénieurs. Parmi les conditions qui rendent possible cet effort de rationalisation on en retient trois : 1° la production d’une littérature technique qui assure un nouveau mode de transmission des connaissances désormais requises et alimente des élaborations successives, 2° l’essor de la science des mécaniques et de la physique mécaniste qui fondent les calculs des ingénieurs et rendent possible la formalisation méthodique des projets. Au temps de Vauban, l’ancrage institutionnel d’une idéologie scientifique appuie et renforce ces applications, 3° la procédure du prix-fait avec enchères publiques qui réglemente au plus juste les intérêts du roi, les exigences techniques du devis de l’ingénieur et les avantages économiques escomptés par des entrepreneurs susceptibles d’assumer les risques financiers et techniques de l’entreprise des travaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".