Two-stage estimator for the complete inertia tensor of uncooperative debris on CubeSat based Active Debris Removal missions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The threat of debris collisions in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) has driven many researchers to develop Active Debris Removal (ADR) missions to manage large debris in LEO. A modern method of capturing debris with a non-rigid tether has been a recent research focus because of difficult post capture dynamics associated with controlling an uncooperative debris through a tether. To facilitate these control schemes, this paper proposes a new two-stage inertia estimator that estimates all principal and products of inertia for an uncooperative space debris using LiDAR and tether force measurements made on-board a CubeSat sized chaser satellite. The method proposed in this work estimates the debris center of mass with a novel pseudo measurement Kalman Filter so that the full inertia tensor can be subsequently estimated using an additional iterative parameter identification algorithm. In addition, the paper achieves online inertia estimation without assuming the tether connection point on the debris by approximating its location using tether tension measurements. The proposed control and estimation scheme is shown in this paper to estimate the full debris inertia tensor even with frequent tether slackness. Two simulation scenarios are presented in this paper, one where the connection point of the tether on the debris is approximated using noiseless measurements of tether tension, and a second where the location of the tether connection point is approximated using noisy measurements of tether tension. For the simulation conditions used in this research, it is shown that the proposed two-stage estimator (TSE) is successful for both cases that the debris is inertially asymmetrical and tri-inertial with non-zero products of inertia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".