MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392937145 · doi:10.3233/faia240140

Spectrum Modeling Using only RGB Values

2024· book-chapter· en· W4392937145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcGill University
KeywordsRGB color modelColor spaceSpectral colorMean squared errorMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceChromogenicICC profileColor modelAlgorithmStatisticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most effective approach to achieving color consistency lies in accurate spectrum modeling, and the key to recover a faded spectrum is to recall the chromogenic metamer. In this paper, a spectral modeling mechanism is designed utilizing three primary colors as its core. Spectral recovering has been completed for all of the 1269 Munsell colors with corresponding RGB parameters. With both maximum entropy (ME) and least mean square error (LS) objectives, the mechanism works well with a result of 0.0046 as the average mean square error in the whole Munsell color space. The contribution of our approach not only lies in the accurate conversion from RGB to spectrum, but also in developing a set of color metamers for chromogenic methods of color calibration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it