MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392940654 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000003924

Letter: Point of View: What Are We Doing? The Incredible Expense and Uncertain Value of Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic and Therapeutic “Advances”

2024· letter· en· W4392940654 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jaffar Hussain, Rafael Sanchez‐Salas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerProstatectomyMEDLINECancerLibrary scienceGynecologyGeneral surgeryFamily medicineInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetters to the Editor19 Mar 2024Letter: Point of View: What Are We Doing? The Incredible Expense and Uncertain Value of Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic and Therapeutic "Advances" Jaffar Hussain and Rafael Sanchez-Salas Jaffar HussainJaffar Hussain Corresponding Author: Jaffar Hussain, MD, MSc, Department of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec , Canada E-mail Address: [email protected] Department of Urolog, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Rafael Sanchez-SalasRafael Sanchez-Salas Department of Urolog, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003924AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Letter: Point of View: What Are We Doing? The Incredible Expense and Uncertain Value of Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnostic and Therapeutic "Advances"." The Journal of Urology, Publish Ahead of Print, pp. REFERENCES 1. . Point of view: what are we doing? The incredible expense and uncertain value of localized prostate cancer diagnostic and therapeutic "advances."J Urol.2024; 211(2):320-321. Link, Google Scholar 2. . Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression. Eur Urol Oncol.2022; 5(6):617-627. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . The predictive value of preoperative negative prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging for lymph node metastatic prostate cancer. J Urol.2021; 205(6):1655-1662. Link, Google Scholar 4. . Robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy—is the jury still out?. JAMA Netw Open.2021; 4(8):e2120693. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5. . Assessment of out-of-pocket costs for robotic cancer surgery in US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(1):e1919185. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6. . Oncological results and cancer control definition in focal therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis.2023. 10.1038/s41391-023-00699-7. Crossref, Google Scholar Funding/Support: None. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: Institutional Review Board approval was not required because this paper is based on publicly available databases. Author Contributions: Conception and design: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. Data analysis and interpretation: Hussain. Data acquisition: Hussain. Drafting the manuscript: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Hussain. Supervision: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Jaffar Hussain Department of Urolog, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Corresponding Author: Jaffar Hussain, MD, MSc, Department of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec , Canada E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Rafael Sanchez-Salas Department of Urolog, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Funding/Support: None. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: Institutional Review Board approval was not required because this paper is based on publicly available databases. Author Contributions: Conception and design: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. Data analysis and interpretation: Hussain. Data acquisition: Hussain. Drafting the manuscript: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Hussain. Supervision: Hussain, Sanchez-Salas. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0140.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Urology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→