Automating Lichen Monitoring in Ecological Studies Using Instance Segmentation of Time-Lapse Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lichens are symbiotic organisms composed of fungi, algae, and/or cyanobacteria that thrive in a variety of environments. They play important roles in carbon and nitrogen cycling, and contribute directly and indirectly to biodiversity. Ecologists typically monitor lichens by using them as indicators to assess air quality and habitat conditions. In particular, epiphytic lichens, which live on trees, are key markers of air quality and environmental health. A new method of monitoring epiphytic lichens involves using time-lapse cameras to gather images of lichen populations. These cameras are used by ecologists in Newfoundland and Labrador to subsequently analyze and manually segment the images to determine lichen thalli condition and change. These methods are time-consuming and susceptible to observer bias. In this work, we aim to automate the monitoring of lichens over extended periods and to estimate their biomass and condition to facilitate the task of ecologists. To accomplish this, our proposed framework uses semantic segmentation with an effective training approach to automate monitoring and biomass estimation of epiphytic lichens on time-lapse images. We show that our method has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy and efficiency of lichen population monitoring, making it a valuable tool for forest ecologists and environmental scientists to evaluate the impact of climate change on Canada's forests. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such an approach has been used to assist ecologists in monitoring and analyzing epiphytic lichens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".