MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predicting Defective and Good Tyre Quality Status with Pre-Trained CNN Models

2023· article· en· W4392943806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tyres are a critical organization for the safety, performance and driving comfort of vehicles. The qualities of tires are one of the direct characteristics of the travel experience and have a great impact on the safety of passengers and passengers. In recent years, thanks to developments in image processing and artificial intelligence technologies, the use of image-based methods in the color determination process of tires has increased significantly. Considering these conditions, tire errors were detected in two models to detect these extinguisher tire errors. Tire Classification Dataset was used to make these explanations. SqueezeNet and InceptionV3 pre-trained models were used as the classification model. As a result of the work done, a accuracy rate of 94.1% was achieved with the SqueezeNet model and 94.8% with the InceptionV3 model. It is envisaged that tire temperature, which can be integrated into the systems of the proposed models, can be detected quickly and reliably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it