MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392949558 · doi:10.5206/mf.v9i1.18028

Rapport de la conférence d’Alice Laumier, Penser l’après-coup en littérature contemporaine : vers une approche critique du trauma

2024· article· fr· W4392949558 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Shunzi Redfern

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il s’agit d’un rapport de la conférence hybride d’Alice Laumier, qui s’est tenue le 8 mars 2024, à l’Université de Toronto, et organisée par la directrice du Département de français, Anne-Marie Brousseau, suivi d’une réflexion de ma part à partir de cette présentation de Laumier. Mon ajout est à propos d’une lecture récente de traduction sur un passage d’un livre de Sarah Kofman, Rue Ordener, Rue Labat, qui relate l’effet d’après-coup que lui provoque un film de Hitchcock, The Lady Vanishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouvances FrancophonesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207