MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392949764 · doi:10.32920/23681466.v2

Chilean Identity Performativity in Carmen Aguirre’s Chile Con Carne and The Refugee Hotel: Narrative Evidence of the Shortcomings of Canada’s Multiculturalism Discourse

2024· preprint· en· W4392949764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leanne C. Saldanha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformativityMulticulturalismNarrativeIdentity (music)Gender studiesRefugeeSociologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtAestheticsLiteratureLawPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theatre, especially the alternative theatres of immigrant communities, can ask its audience to question social inequities and to seek socio-political change. In my MRP, I use Butler’s theory of performativity and Brechtian distanciation to analyze nuanced Chilean exilic identity depictions in Carmen Aguirre’s plays: Chile con Carne and The Refugee Hotel. I find that Aguirre’s politically engaged theatre functions as a visceral and compelling counter-narrative that challenges the dominant discourse of Canadian multiculturalism inclusivity. Ultimately, identity performativity, coupled with Brechtian techniques, allows Canadian audiences to understand the nuanced multiplicity and hybridity of Chilean-Canadian lived experiences as fundamentally Canadian narratives that belong, on their own terms, in a pluralistic Canadian society. Keywords: Chilean; Exile; Performativity; Identity; Intersectionality; Theatre; Multiculturalism Discourse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural and Social Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207