MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392950117 · doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v9i27.5799

Charge It Right: Unveiling the Factors to Effective Development Charge Implementation

2024· article· en· W4392950117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Siti Fairuz Che Pin, Nor Azalina Yusnita Abdul Rahman, Nor Aini Salleh, Fatemeh Khozaei

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationWork (physics)UrbanizationBusinessCapital (architecture)Charge (physics)Key (lock)Environmental planningEconomic growthPolitical scienceEngineeringEconomicsComputer securityComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development charges are a globally adopted concept to ease the burden on local governments due to urbanization. Implemented in countries like the US, UK, Australia, Singapore, Canada, and South Africa, Malaysia follows suit with charges tied to increased land value. Based on structured interviews with 39 stakeholders, this study identifies key factors for effective implementation: legislation, human capital, work procedures, and support facilities. Participants highlight the need for streamlined approval processes and strategic integration among departments. Successful development charge implementation optimises land use, reducing infrastructure costs and benefiting public interests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment-Behaviour Proceedings JournalSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207