MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392954203 · doi:10.51168/sjhrafrica.v5i3.1041

COVERAGE AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH HEALTH INSURANCE UTILIZATION AMONG REPRODUCTIVE WOMEN: INSIGHTS FROM TANZANIA DEMOGRAPHIC HEALTH SURVEY 2022. A QUANTITATIVE STUDY.

2024· dissertation· en· W4392954203 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emmanuel Asher Ikwara, Humphrey Atwijukiire, Ritah Atuhaire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeOntario Council on Graduate Studies, Council of Ontario UniversitiesBill and Melinda Gates FoundationIrish AidUNICEFUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsTanzaniaReproductive healthDemographyLogistic regressionEducational attainmentMedicineEnvironmental healthEquity (law)PovertySocioeconomic statusOddsGeographySocioeconomicsPopulationEconomic growthEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Universal Health Coverage aims to alleviate poverty caused by out-of-pocket health expenses, affecting 150 million annually, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Health Insurance plays a crucial role, yet faces challenges like low coverage rates and equity issues. This study aimed to assess the extent of coverage and identify factors influencing the utilization of health insurance among reproductive women in Tanzania, utilizing data from the 2022 Demographic Health Survey. Methods: The study quantitatively examined data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey, involving 15,254 women of reproductive age. The analysis included univariate, bivariable, and multivariable techniques utilizing chi-square and multilevel logistic regression. Findings reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR), determined statistical significance at p<0.05. Results: The overall coverage of Health Insurance (HI) stood at a mere 5.7%. Individuals aged 35-49 years were 1.6 times more inclined to utilize insurance compared to those aged 15-24 years (AOR=1.633, 95%CI: 1.326-2.010). Residents in rural areas exhibited a 1.3 times higher likelihood of using HI compared to their urban counterparts (AOR=1.300, 95%CI: 1.086-1.556). Moreover, individuals with a higher level of education were 8 times more inclined to use HI compared to those with no education (AOR=8.113, 95%CI: 5.009-13.141), indicating a correlation between increased educational attainment and HI utilization. Additionally, participants owning a television were 1.4 times more likely to use HI than those without (AOR=1.419, 95%CI: 1.135-1.774). Those who held an account in a bank or financial institution were 3.9 times more likely to utilize insurance compared to those without an account (AOR=3.999, 95%CI=3.302-4.843). Conclusions: The extent of Health Insurance (HI) coverage in Tanzania continues to fall short, impeding advancements toward universal health coverage. Recommendation: The study recommends bolstering public awareness initiatives to underscore the benefits of HI services and striving to enhance their affordability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207