REFLEKSI AKHIR TAHUN DI SATUAN PENDIDIKAN (SMP PRIMBANA MEDAN)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primbana Medan Middle School is one of the schools selected in the driving school program. Primbana Middle School received training from facilitators from the driving school program. Every month this school attends a meeting with the facilitator via zoom meeting/google meet to evaluate the results of the independent learning curriculum at the school. At the end of the 2022/2023 academic year, a year-end reflection was held to assess how the results of the Free Learning Curriculum program were at the school. The teaching method that we use is group discussion so that it makes it easier for fellow teachers to explain the results of reflection on learning according to the subject group taught and explained using cardboard that has been completed by the school, then fellow teachers explain in turn to see the effect in teaching in a better direction. Fellow teachers are better prepared for the demands of the independent learning curriculum and are more prepared to carry out activities related to the independent learning curriculum. Students are better prepared and trained to explore the basic knowledge they have and can develop it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it