MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392966426 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1395038

Editorial: Compensatory growth: an adaptation to environmental stress in plants and animals

2024· editorial· en· W4392966426 on OpenAlexafffund
Bernard D. Roitberg, E. Tobias Krause, Chao Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaU.S. Forest Service
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Environmental stressBiologyPlant growthFight-or-flight responseBotanyEcologyNeuroscienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compensatory growth: an adaptation to environmental stress in plants and animalsCompensatory growth (CG) can be defined as increased growth rate of a previously restricted organism, and has been documented in a wide range of organisms in both the plant and animal kingdoms.Notably, CG can be expressed at the individual, population or even community level as illustrated in the research of this Research Topic.This widelyobserved phenomenon has been of interest to scientists for more than a century because it directly impacts our understanding of life-history trade-offs and resource productivity, respectively.Interest in CG continues to be a stable Research Topic of interest with on average 463 paper/year in the last decade (i.e.Web of Science, search term "compensatory growth", time-period 2014-2023, minimum annual records 398, maximum 522; as of 2024-01-10).Although compensatory growth is common, it may manifest itself in different ways from exact compensation (often referred to as catching-up growth) to under or over compensation where the comparison is with a non-restricted (i.e.control) group (Figure 1).As such, the variability in compensatory growth is as interesting as the phenomenon itself as it often has severe life-history consequences, e.g.costs on other individuals´traits (Metcalfe and Monaghan, 2001).And, as is the case for many biological phenomena, crosstaxa consideration has the potential to explain both the inner workings and general principles associated with compensatory growth.In this Research Topic, we have assembled 10 papers on various topics related to compensatory growth.In Kong et al., the authors used controlled experiments to study the impact of dryseason irrigation and fertilizers on growth of Eucalyptus stands via enhanced litterfall decomposition.Their work demonstrates the importance of elucidating the drivers of CG, in this case, release of soil nutrients, a key limiting resource for compensatory growth in trees.An ecosystem perspective was taken by Zhou et al. to examine how grasslands recover from drought as a form of CG.Furthermore, the authors consider both aboveground and belowground processes among plants and soil-based microorganisms as determinants of ecosystem level response, post-drought.Here, it is also important to keep in mind that CG Frontiers in Plant Science frontiersin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0180.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207