Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Despite the central role that antibodies play in modern medicine, there is currently no method to design novel antibodies that bind a specific epitope entirely in silico . Instead, antibody discovery currently relies on animal immunization or random library screening approaches. Here, we demonstrate that combining computational protein design using a fine-tuned RFdiffusion network alongside yeast display screening enables the generation of antibody variable heavy chains (VHHs) and single chain variable fragments (scFvs) that bind user-specified epitopes with atomic-level precision. To verify this, we experimentally characterized VHH binders to four disease-relevant epitopes using multiple orthogonal biophysical methods, including cryo-EM, which confirmed the proper Ig fold and binding pose of designed VHHs targeting influenza hemagglutinin and Clostridium difficile toxin B (TcdB). For the influenza-targeting VHH, high-resolution structural data further confirmed the accuracy of CDR loop conformations. While initial computational designs exhibit modest affinity, affinity maturation using OrthoRep enables production of single-digit nanomolar binders that maintain the intended epitope selectivity. We further demonstrate the de novo design of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), creating binders to TcdB and a Phox2b peptide-MHC complex by combining designed heavy and light chain CDRs. Cryo-EM structural data confirmed the proper Ig fold and binding pose for two distinct TcdB scFvs, with high-resolution data for one design additionally verifying the atomically accurate conformations of all six CDR loops. Our approach establishes a framework for the rational computational design, screening, isolation, and characterization of fully de novo antibodies with atomic-level precision in both structure and epitope targeting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".